I,
like many other book readers, typically read the back covers of books before
starting them. Usually, the back cover gives a brief summary of the book and a
small biographical blurb about the author. So it comes as no surprise that The
Reluctant Fundamentalist follows suit. This usually standard format gained
a whole new meaning however, when I noticed something fascinating within the
two blurbs. They mirrored each other. The summary says that Changez is from
Pakistan. Hamid is also from Pakistan. It says that Changez studied abroad at
Princeton. Hamid, summa cum laude at Princeton. These similarities continue ,
though more discreetly, for one would have to look up an extended biography of
Moshin Hamid (which I did).
Now
the question is, what does it matter? I think that in order to proceed along
this line of thought we need to dismiss the notion that writers are just blank
faced creativity machines shrouded in anonymity. Hamid is far from anonymous,
in fact, he probably seeks attention for his book. His book is written on a
controversial topic with a dangerous tone towards terrorism. Because we know that Hamid and his character Changez are so similar in many ways, there is a high risk that Hamid's book maybe interpreted as his own declaration of anti-American sentiments, like those of Changez.
My
understanding of the book as a whole is enhanced in an irreversible way with
the knowledge of Hamids fairly parallel life. Ethos is given in large doses to
reader, knowing as they read the descriptions of Changez’s Princeton social
life and his outsider-ness that they are probably reading Hamid’s personal
account. Hamid gains my trust as an accurate and relevant storyteller for the
particular story, and this makes it harder to place the story in a fictional
light.
It
seems to me that this loss of “fantasy” in the story is something that it
gains. Hamid’s goal in writing this book was to educate Americans on the lives
of transplanted Muslim Americans, and show them the downward spiral, aided by
anti-Muslim bigotry, that pushes those successful citizens toward hatred of the
US. Hamid wanted to make the story as real as possible. I believe that in
getting his point across it is necessary for the reader to see the story as
very possible, and a very real threat. Hamid’s biography shows us that this
story is not plucked from thin air, it is solid and made from a base of real
experiences.
Although
further reading of an extended biography on Hamid reveals that he has some
pretty drastic differences with the Changez near the end of the book, this
seeming discrepancy adds another level of introspection to the book. By
presenting the reader with both his own successful American story and Changez’s
eventually disastrous one, Hamid is showing the reader that they could have so
easily gone the other way. While Hamid reaped the benefits of an American
education and capitalism, Changez was disheartened and eventually made to
resent America. Hamid wants the readers to know that he could have easily lived
Changez’s life. Had he been exposed to just a bit more Islamiphobia, to a bit
more of the horrors of capitalism, or even met Juan Bautista, he could be in
Pakistan right now lecturing on the poisonous nature of American society,
inadvertently encouraging future terrorists, like Changez did. The Reluctant
Fundamentalist is not just a tale feared by Americans, but a tale feared by
innocent Muslim/middle-eastern people everywhere, who are slowly poisoned by
the tyrannical capitalist giant that is America.
i thought your understanding that the shared history was a way of Hamid displaying positive ethos was very interesting; and i definitely agree that this made the conclusion of Changez's story all the more probable. This was well written and very focused, it was a intriguing thesis, and you could easily develop your thought even further and make this an essay if need be.
ReplyDelete